MFEdu Introduction Course  /  Lesson 4 of 14 · Media Literacy

Media Literacy

Digital Media Literacy

While researching stories and advocacy interests, a lot of questionable information will be found online. MakeFashion Edu presents Michael Caulfield’s SIFT Course — a series of lessons on separating fact from fiction online.

Key Terms

  • Misinformation: Unintentional mistakes such as inaccurate photo captions, dates, statistics, translations, or when satire is taken seriously.
  • Disinformation: Fabricated or deliberately manipulated audio/visual content. Intentionally created conspiracy theories or rumors.
  • Malinformation: True information used with intent to harm.

The SIFT Method

Stop. Investigate. Find. Trace.

  • 🛑 Stop — Pause before sharing or believing something
  • 🔍 Investigate — Look into the source, not just the claim
  • 🔎 Find — Look for better coverage of the same topic
  • 🔗 Trace — Follow claims, quotes, and media back to their original context

📚 Check, Please! Starter Course — For Teachers 📚 Check, Please! MFEdu Student Lessons — For Students 📝 Teacher Notes for Check, Please! Course

Quick Version (10-minute adaptation)

If full media literacy time is not available, a quick discussion about how the concept relates to these projects is very helpful.

Activity: Each project team should answer the following questions:

  1. What do you know about the issue you are interested in?
  2. How did you learn what you know? (Experience, saw news/social media, heard from somebody, etc.)
  3. Where will you research more information?

In order to advocate for or against something, it is best to educate yourself about it. If the electronics of a project are assembled with the wrong facts in mind, it can take a lot of time to change plans! Search and research — but beware of disinformation and misinformation.

Example: Fashion Industry & Pollution

This is a worked example of using SIFT for a MakeFashion project:

Say I hear that the fashion industry is the 2nd largest polluter in the world and I want my design to encourage people to change their habits and buy used clothing instead of new fast fashion.

I do a Google search for “fashion industry pollution rank” and find a New York Times article stating that the claim that the fashion industry is the 2nd biggest polluter is disputed. I STOP and think about this. The NYT is a trusted news source. I’ll see what they have to say. I see several studies cited with links to other pieces.

I don’t just stop at one source — I continue searching and find differing opinions and statistics. I FIND that the fashion industry is a contributor to pollution, but the “2nd largest” claim is contested. Because of this, I adjust how I would present it on my runway piece — I would not claim “2nd biggest polluter” because that would be spreading misinformation. I can still advocate for sustainable fashion using accurate information.

Useful links on this example: