Advocacy by Design  /  Lesson 1 of 17 · Find Your Story

Clothes Talk

Badge pathway: Empathize

Look down at what you’re wearing right now. You made about a dozen decisions this morning — some on purpose, most on autopilot — and every one of them is talking. A team jersey says I belong to something. Paint-stained sneakers say I make things. A carefully ripped pair of jeans says these are ripped, but on purpose, and that matters.

Since the first humans put on the first clothes, outfits have carried meaning: colors once reserved for royalty, stripes forced onto prisoners, uniforms that turn a group of kids into a team. Fashion pulls people together, sets them apart, and — the part this course is about — makes arguments. A runway piece is a statement you wear, and by the end of this course, you’ll build one that argues for something you believe in, in fabric and light.

Activity: Read the room

Pair up. Look at what your partner is wearing — really look — and tell them the story you think their outfit is telling today. Then ask them: “What story do you think I’m telling?”

Expect surprises. The gap between the story you meant to wear and the story someone read is exactly the gap designers learn to close.

See it in action: Carrie, MakeFashion Edu’s co-founder, reads her own outfit.

One important warning

We do tell stories with our clothes — but nobody’s outfit is their whole story, and our stories change daily. Reading an outfit is a starting point for curiosity, never a verdict on a person. Stereotyping is the lazy version of what designers do; we’re going to do the careful version.

For teachers: Run the pair activity before any vocabulary. If discussion stalls, prompt with professions — what does a chef’s uniform argue? A judge’s robe? Why does a referee’s shirt need to be instantly readable? Close on the stereotyping point above; it reliably produces the best discussion of the day.

Before you move on

  • You told someone the story of your own outfit
  • You heard a story in someone else’s — and got at least one read wrong, which is the point